February 2018 - by Thomas Driesner
Most people probably struggle to imagine what Switzerland's subsurface looks like at depths of hundreds or thousands of metres. Yet it contains some key resources. Groundwater, gravel and sand have long been exploited, but deeper underground there is much untapped potential in the form of geothermal heat and porous rock layers. Computer models make the subsurface visible, enabling us to plan uses of geo-energies.
As a geologist, I am always fascinated by how much the
subsurface contributes to our daily lives: from the
groundwater we drink, to the oil and gas that power our
vehicles and heating systems, to metals that play such
an essential role in products as diverse as bicycles,
smartphones and heating pipes. But also building
materials like sand and gravel or the raw materials for
concrete and cement come from the ground. Although no
metal ore, oil or gas are mined in Switzerland, there is
great hidden potential in our subsurface.
For example, geothermal heat is available everywhere, and the deeper we drill to access it, the more the energy yield increases. Naturally, we would like to tap into this potential to use it for our heating systems and to generate power. However, this is difficult to do, for the process of extracting geothermal energy from a depth of four to five kilometres in a precise and efficient manner is still relatively untried. Which is why researchers around the world, including some at the SCCER-SoE, are working to develop it.
Another exciting domain where the geological underground
could play a major role in establishing green energy
technologies is intermediate energy storage. In many
cases, energy accumulates exactly when we do not need
it, at the height of summer for example. Counteracting
this problem is the goal of the
GEothermie 2020
project currently under way in Geneva, with scientific
support from the SCCER-SoE: in future summers, part of
the water that is heated by the excess heat from a waste
incineration plant shall be stored in porous rock layers
deep underground instead of feeding it into the local
district heating system. Only when the cold winter comes
will it be pumped back up to the surface and piped to
the several thousand households.
The dependability of planned geothermal energy projects hinges on having an accurate picture of the geological underground. And the best way to gain such an overview is by drilling down thousands of metres. However, this is expensive, so boreholes are sunk primarily in regions with extensive oil and gas deposits, such as Holland or northern Germany. As far as we currently know, Switzerland has no such deposits, so up to now little deep drilling has taken place. One exception, though, is the set of around a dozen boreholes sunk by Nagra in the search for suitable sites for radioactive waste repositories. Additional information stems from seismic surveys in which the path taken by sound waves through the subsurface is tracked and analysed in order to constrain the position of various rock layers.
One of the SCCER-SoE's tasks is to use such drilling and seismic data to create a virtual 3D model of Switzerland's subsurface. The organisation in charge of this undertaking is the Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo, which together with its regional partners (mainly universities) collates and analyses the data, which include temperature measurements from deep drilling and more superficial boreholes (just a few hundred metres deep). These data help to provide a clearer picture of temperature distribution in the subsurface. Up to now, there was no way of doing this, the only guide being a geothermal surface heat flow map. The new 3D model will shortly become available online for project planners and all other interested parties via swisstopo. With this information about deep rock layers and temperatures, specialists can assess the best locations for geothermal energy projects.
However, although gaining a picture of the underground
is important, it is equally essential to find out
whether the intended technologies actually work there.
Does the hot water stay in the desired place after being
stored or does it flow somewhere else? Does it cool too
quickly when coming into contact with the rock? Do the
minerals in the rock dissolve in the hot water and then
precipitate again during the cooling process? Does
injecting the water trigger ground movements? Computer
programs that can be used to model these processes play
a key role in answering these questions. Researchers
from the SCCER-SoE are currently refining such programs.
In the future, for example, they should be able to
directly input the new models of Switzerland's
subsurface and calculate whether - and, if so, how -
geothermal energy technology can be made to work there.
Research on such modelling procedures is currently being
carried out in a number of countries. Within the
framework of the
International Partnership for Geothermal Technology
(IPGT), our experts collaborate with colleagues from
Australia, Iceland, New Zealand and the USA.
When I was a student, I could not have conceived of such research. Back then, earth sciences were considered rather old-fashioned and barely relevant for technological innovation. But the situation has since changed drastically, and today exciting future challenges associated with finding a sustainable, environmentally friendly energy supply are key fields of research in our academic domain. I am pleased for our students that these topics are now so strongly represented at ETH Zurich and other Swiss universities.
Until the end of 2017, Professor Thomas Driesner from the Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology ETH Zurich was the SCCER-SoE's geo energies project coordinator (WP1). Besides developing modelling programs, he also carries out research into natural geothermal systems (e.g. in Iceland) and how copper and gold ore deposits form around volcanoes.